[ Studio Logo ]
IQVA 2.0 · Reader's Guide
How to Read
the IQVA Report.
A short guide to what you receive, how each section works, and how to use the interactive tools that make the dossier a living instrument — not a static document.
Overview 00 — What you receive after an IQVA evaluation
Two documents.
Different purposes.
When IP Frontier Studio completes an IQVA evaluation of your intellectual property, you receive two distinct deliverables. They serve different audiences, carry different levels of confidentiality, and are meant to be used in different stages of your commercial strategy.
Document 01 · No NDA required
Public Summary
1 page · shareable
- Verdict and confidence level
- IQVA Global score (0–5)
- Block scores across the 6 dimensions
- Top 3 strengths and top 3 risks
- 30–60 day next-step plan
- Free to share with buyers, board members, partners and stakeholders
Document 02 · Under NDA
Full Dossier
25–30 pages · confidential
- Complete analysis across all 6 dimensions
- Vertical-by-vertical breakdown (4 verticals)
- Detailed risk map with mitigations
- Eight interactive analysis modules
- Investment scenarios and territorial analysis
- Audit-ready evidence matrix
- For internal decision-making and confidential negotiation
When to use which
The Public Summary is your business card — share it freely. The Full Dossier is your strategic asset — keep it under NDA and use it to make decisions, prepare negotiations and defend positions internally.
Overview 01 — The Public Summary
One page.
The whole picture.
The Public Summary is designed to deliver the essential verdict in a single page that can be read in under three minutes. It is not a teaser of the full report — it is a complete, self-contained executive snapshot.
Anatomy of the page
Header
IP name, type of assessment, date, country and age range. The basic identification — what was evaluated and when.
Verdict Box
One of three possible verdicts — GO-VERDE, GO-AMARILLO or NO-GO — together with a confidence level (High / Medium / Low). The verdict is a directional recommendation; the confidence level reflects the strength of the evidence behind that recommendation.
IQVA Global
The global score on a 0–5 scale, with two decimals. This is the headline number. It is derived from the six block scores — see Section 03 below — but it is not the only thing to read. Two IPs with the same Global score can have very different vertical profiles.
Buyer-fit
The recommended primary buyer profile (Publisher · Producer · Licensee · Streamer · EdTech platform), with one descriptive line that captures the IP's commercial archetype.
Block Scores
The six dimension scores (0–5), laid out side by side. Reading them together tells you where the IP is strong and where it is weak. A balanced 4.0 profile is different from a 3.0/5.0 profile that averages the same.
Top 3 Strengths
The three structural strengths the analysis surfaced. These are not marketing claims — they are the elements you can credibly defend in front of a buyer or an investment committee.
Top 3 Risks
The three principal risks, each tagged by dimension (Commercial · Market · Brand · Legal · Operational) and severity (Low · Medium · High), with a one-line mitigation strategy. This is the most actionable part of the page.
Next-Step Plan
A 30–60 day validation plan with three concrete tests. Each test has a metric, a success threshold and a decision rule. This converts the verdict into a runnable plan.
Scope Note
A footer reminding the reader that this is a public summary and that the full methodology, traceability, comparables and extended evidence are delivered exclusively under NDA.
How to use it commercially
Attach the Public Summary to early conversations with buyers, send it ahead of meetings as pre-read, include it in pitch decks as third-party validation, or share it with internal stakeholders who need the headline without the full analysis.
Overview 02 — The Full Dossier (under NDA)
Twenty-five
to thirty pages.
The Full Dossier is the working document. It is structured into thirteen sections that walk from the executive verdict down to the audit trail of the evidence. The eight interactive modules — explained in Section 06 — are embedded across these sections.
What you'll find inside
01Viability Assessment — Verdict & Rationale
The expanded executive verdict. Not just GO or NO-GO — the reasoning behind it, the conditions that support it, and the dependencies that could shift it.
02Complete IP Profile
The IP as the system understands it: concept core, audience, narrative engine, declared positioning, declared transmedia ambition. The mirror you can check against your own intent.
03Viability Scoring & Risk Profile
The six block scores with their rationale, plus the risk map. Includes the Score Rationale & Adjustment module — see Section 06.
04What This Means for Decision-Making
The verdict translated into operational and commercial implications. What the result means for editorial decisions, audiovisual decisions, product decisions, EdTech decisions.
05Score Rationale — Blocks 1 through 6
A dedicated narrative for each of the six dimensions. Why this score, what supports it, what would move it. This is where the depth of analysis lives.
06Investment & Return Scenarios
The financial dimension. An interactive simulator for entry strategy, investment volume, deployment speed and market scope. See Section 06 below.
07Territory Entry Analysis
Geographical strategy. Which territories to enter, in what order, and why. Interactive — you can adjust market variables and see priority shifts in real time.
08Format Adaptation Analysis
Vertical adaptation. How the IP performs when translated across editorial, audiovisual, product/licensing and EdTech. Highlights friction points and adaptation costs.
09Pedagogical Architecture & EdTech Fit
A parallel educational analysis covering pedagogical load, socio-emotional learning, cognitive design and institutional scalability. Does not affect the IQVA score; enriches the EdTech narrative.
10Commercial Narrative & Message Architecture
The commercial readiness of the IP across three axes. Outputs include mitigation recommendations on iconography, partnership mediation and narrative structure.
1112–24 Month Implementation Plan
A roadmap to bring the IP to the next viability threshold. Concrete actions, milestones and decision points across the next 12–24 months.
1230–60 Day GO/NO-GO Validation Plan
The expanded version of the next-step plan you see in the Public Summary. Each test fully specified: metric, threshold, cost, audience, decision rule.
13Audit-Ready Evidence Matrix
Traceability appendix. Every conclusion in the dossier maps back to the underlying evidence — either Evidence A (your material) or Evidence B (the verified corpus). This is what makes the dossier defensible in an investment committee.
Structure 03 — The six dimensions of analysis
Six independent
lenses on the IP.
Every IQVA evaluation looks at the IP through six structural dimensions. They are independent of each other — an IP can score high on one and low on another — and the Global score is the integration of all six. Reading them separately is what gives the report its diagnostic power.
B1Origin & Signal
"Does this IP respond to a real, verified cultural, educational or consumer shift?"
Without a confirmed market signal, everything else is theoretical. B1 anchors the IP to a documented direction the world is already moving in — or flags that no such direction was found.
B2Cognitive & Educational
"Is the IP cognitively and pedagogically calibrated for the declared age range?"
If it doesn't work in the child's mind — attention, memory, comprehension, voluntary repetition — it doesn't work commercially. B2 evaluates whether the IP is built for the brain it claims to serve.
B3Market & Category
"Is there structural room in the category for this IP?"
Comparables, demand, differentiation, saturation, concentration. B3 decides whether the IP is competing for a slice of an existing pie or carving out a new one — both can succeed, but the strategy is completely different.
B4Transmedia & Commercial
"Does the IP survive the jump between formats without losing its identity?"
Visual identity, cross-format coherence, rhythm between layers, emotional transfer. B4 determines the ceiling of the licensing and adaptation potential. A weak B4 caps the long-term commercial value regardless of how good the original format is.
B5Territorial & Universal
"Does the IP travel across territories without structural redesign?"
Cultural friction, narrative elasticity, format viability across markets with different consumption habits. B5 defines how international the IP can realistically become and how much localization work each new territory requires.
B6Buyer-fit & Legal
"Can this IP be presented, sold and protected cleanly?"
Concept gravity, brand safety, prototype feasibility, rights ownership and platform compliance. B6 is the final filter before a serious commercial conversation. It catches the issues that derail negotiations even when the creative is strong.
Why six dimensions matter together
A Global of 4.0 with all six blocks at 4.0 is a different IP than a Global of 4.0 with three blocks at 5.0 and three at 3.0. The first is structurally balanced. The second has standout strengths but also structural weaknesses that need addressing. The shape of the profile matters as much as the Global number.
Structure 04 — Verdict & Confidence
Two layers,
read together.
The verdict gives you the direction. The confidence level tells you how solid the evidence behind that direction is. Both matter, and both should be read together — a high-confidence GO-AMARILLO is a different commercial proposition than a low-confidence GO-VERDE.
The three verdicts
Verdict
GO-VERDE
High structural viability. The IP shows strong fundamentals across the six dimensions. Recommended to move forward with active commercial development.
Verdict
GO-AMARILLO
Conditional viability. The IP has clear strengths but also defined weaknesses. Recommended to move forward only after addressing the conditions listed in the risk map.
Verdict
NO-GO
Insufficient structural viability today. The IP has structural gaps that would make near-term commercial development unwise. Recommended to revisit fundamentals before further investment.
The three confidence levels
High
The evidence behind the verdict is strong and consistent. Your Evidence A is complete and the verified corpus has solid coverage of the relevant categories and territories. The verdict can be defended with confidence in front of any audience.
Medium
The verdict is directionally clear but supporting evidence has some gaps — typically a partial Evidence A, or limited comparables in the specific subcategory. The verdict holds but invites stress-testing in the weaker areas.
Low
The verdict is preliminary. Significant pieces of Evidence A were missing, or the IP operates in a category with very thin verifiable data. Use as orientation, not as a decision basis. A second evaluation after gathering more material is recommended.
Reading verdict + confidence together
A GO-VERDE / High is a green light you can act on. A GO-VERDE / Low is encouraging but premature — gather more evidence before committing capital. A GO-AMARILLO / High is a precise instruction: the conditions to clear are real and well-supported.
Structure 05 — Vertical breakdown
Four verticals.
Four readiness states.
Beyond the Global score, the dossier breaks the IP down by commercial vertical: Editorial, Audiovisual, Product/Licensing and EdTech. Each vertical receives its own score and a readiness state that tells you whether the IP is operationally ready for that path today.
The four verticals
V1Editorial
Picture books, early readers, middle grade, graphic novels. Subcategories evaluated independently when the IP is positioned across age ranges.
V2Audiovisual
Audiobooks, animated shorts, episodic series, feature films, kids streaming originals, short-form content for kids-safe platforms.
V3Product / Licensing
Plush, toys, puzzles, textiles, collectibles, smart toys, home goods. Includes broader licensing readiness for cross-category extensions.
V4EdTech
Educational apps, reading platforms, institutional educational resources, animation-supported curricula.
The three readiness states
Status
Ready
Operationally viable for this vertical today. The IP can be brought to a buyer in this vertical without structural rework.
Status
Conditional
Viable in this vertical with defined conditions. Specific gaps need to be closed before a commercial conversation will land cleanly.
Status
Not-ready
Not recommended for this vertical at this time. The IP does not currently have the structural prerequisites for a serious commercial conversation in this path.
Why four verticals instead of one number
Most children's IPs are not equally strong across all four verticals. An IP can be Ready for Editorial, Conditional for Audiovisual, Ready for Product and Not-ready for EdTech. Reading the four verticals separately lets you sequence your commercial roadmap intelligently — starting where you are strongest, building toward the conditional verticals, and de-prioritizing the not-ready ones.
Decision-making 06 — Eight interactive modules
The dossier is alive.
Use it.
The Full Dossier embeds eight interactive modules that turn the evaluation into a working instrument. None of them require technical skills or external software — they live inside the dossier itself and respond in real time as you explore scenarios. This section explains what each one does, how to operate it, what it adds to your analysis and when to reach for it.
Tool 01
Score Rationale & Adjustment
What it is
An editable view of the six block scores. You can manually adjust any block to see how the Global score and the four vertical scores recalculate in real time. It is not a way to invent a better verdict — it is a way to simulate the impact of focused improvements.
How you use it
- Identify the block where you have the most realistic upside (typically the lowest of the six).
- Edit that block's score upward to a level you could credibly reach in 6–12 months of focused work.
- Observe how the Global score and each vertical status change.
- Repeat with a different block to compare which investment gives you the better return.
What it adds to the report
- Turns a static verdict into a prioritization tool
- Shows which dimensions are the highest-leverage targets for your next sprint
- Surfaces non-obvious paths to a higher verdict (sometimes B4 lifts more than B3)
- Builds an evidence-based argument for where to spend development capital next
When to use it
- After receiving a GO-AMARILLO and wanting to plan the path to GO-VERDE
- Before committing budget to a specific area of the IP — to model expected impact
- When defending priorities in front of a board or investor
- To pressure-test a proposed improvement plan against the actual score sensitivity
Tool 02
Investment & Return Scenarios
What it is
A scenario explorer that translates the IQVA profile into a financial picture: how investment volume, vertical of entry, deployment speed and market scope interact for this specific IP. It is not a forecast — it is a structured way to stress-test commitments before signing them.
How you use it
- Choose the vertical you would enter through (Editorial · Audiovisual · Product · EdTech).
- Set the investment volume on the slider — calibrated to typical commitments in children's IP at this profile.
- Choose deployment speed (Conservative · Balanced · Aggressive) and target market scope (Local · Regional · Global).
- Read the outputs: indicative break-even window, ROI range over 36 months, confidence level of the scenario and a written rationale.
What it adds to the report
- Translates the IQVA score into something a CFO or investment committee can read
- Surfaces the sensitivity of returns to entry strategy — the same IP can show very different shapes
- Anchors discussions in scenarios with explicit assumptions, not in gut estimates
- Produces a paragraph you can paste directly into an investment memo
When to use it
- Before approving a development budget internally
- During co-production negotiations to anchor your counter-offer
- When two verticals look equally attractive and you need a tie-breaker
- To stress-test a partner's proposal against your own scenario
Tool 03
Territory Entry Analysis
What it is
A territory-by-territory panel that lets you evaluate the IP's fit across the major children's content markets. For each territory you can adjust a small set of market variables and watch the priority ranking recompute. It is your geographical strategy lab.
How you use it
- Open the territory chip for the market you want to model (Europe, North America, Latam, Asia, Nordic, etc.).
- Adjust the market variables to reflect your knowledge of that territory and your IP's positioning there.
- Compare the resulting territory score with the others to see where the IP has the strongest natural fit.
- Read the "Natural Priority Markets (Top 3)" output — this is the system's recommendation given your adjustments.
What it adds to the report
- Replaces gut-feeling territorial intuition with a structured comparison
- Identifies counter-intuitive opportunities (often Nordic or Asian markets that local studios overlook)
- Sequences entry order — where to launch first, second, third
- Highlights territories where the IP would need structural localization before entry
When to use it
- Before signing a multi-territory licensing agreement
- When planning your festival or rights-fair strategy (Bologna, MIPCOM, Frankfurt)
- To prepare a territorial roll-out plan for an internal stakeholder
- When a partner proposes a market you hadn't considered — to validate or challenge it
Tool 04
Format Adaptation Analysis
What it is
A breakdown of how the IP performs when adapted across the four commercial verticals. It identifies the friction points of each translation and estimates the structural cost of adaptation. Helps you understand where the IP moves easily and where it would need real work.
How you use it
- Start with the vertical the IP was born in — read the natural strength there.
- Move through the other three verticals and read the adaptation rationale for each.
- Identify the friction points — they are usually concrete (pacing, character density, episode structure, licensable assets).
- Use the analysis to scope adaptation budgets and creative scopes realistically.
What it adds to the report
- Calibrates expectations across verticals — no vertical is the same investment
- Identifies the structural blockers that would derail a vertical jump
- Suggests the optimal sequence of vertical expansion
- Quantifies (in qualitative terms) the adaptation effort each path requires
When to use it
- When a buyer asks you about a vertical you hadn't planned
- Before signing an option agreement that bundles multiple verticals
- To scope a co-development conversation with a partner from a different vertical
- When briefing an external producer or licensee on what the IP can and cannot do
Tool 05
Viability Scoring & Risk Profile
What it is
The complete risk map of the IP, organized by dimension (Commercial, Market, Brand, Legal, Operational). Each risk is tagged by severity and accompanied by a concrete mitigation strategy. It is the operational layer of the dossier — the part you turn into action items.
How you use it
- Scan the risk map for High-severity items first — these are the deal-breakers.
- Move to Medium-severity items — these are typically the conditions of a GO-AMARILLO verdict.
- For each risk you decide to address, copy its mitigation strategy into your sprint plan.
- Assign owners and deadlines to each mitigation. Return to the risk map as a checklist.
What it adds to the report
- Converts the verdict into an executable action plan
- Separates the strategic risks (Brand, Market) from the operational ones (Legal, Compliance)
- Gives you the language to discuss risks with each stakeholder in their own terms
- Anticipates the questions a sophisticated buyer or investor will ask
When to use it
- The moment you receive the dossier — start with the risk map
- Before any high-stakes pitch, to pre-empt the hardest questions
- To brief your operational and legal teams on what to clean up
- When updating an evaluation — risks that were High should ideally be Medium or Low
Tool 06
Pedagogical Architecture & EdTech Fit
What it is
A parallel educational analysis of the IP across four pedagogical dimensions: pedagogical load, socio-emotional learning, cognitive design and implementation scalability. It does not affect the IQVA score — it arms you with the language to talk to educators, institutions and EdTech buyers.
How you use it
- Read each of the four pedagogical dimensions and absorb the key claims.
- Note the alignment with educational frameworks (Reggio Emilia, Montessori, EYFS, Common Core, LOMLOE).
- Pull the strongest claims into your EdTech-facing pitch deck verbatim.
- Use the implementation analysis to scope institutional rollouts realistically.
What it adds to the report
- Gives the IP credibility with educational and institutional buyers
- Surfaces structural pedagogical strengths the creative team may not have articulated
- Flags adult-mediation dependency — critical for autonomous EdTech products
- Aligns the IP with named curricular frameworks, opening institutional doors
When to use it
- Before approaching any EdTech platform or institutional buyer
- When applying for educational grants, certifications or institutional partnerships
- To inform the creative direction of educational extensions of the IP
- When responding to procurement processes that require pedagogical evidence
Tool 07
Commercial Narrative & Message Architecture
What it is
A commercial-readiness analysis across three structural axes: iconographic strength, audience familiarity and activation readiness. The output is a set of concrete mitigation recommendations on iconography, partnership mediation and narrative architecture. It is your commercial briefing document.
How you use it
- Read the three axis scores and identify the weakest.
- Open the mitigation recommendation tied to that axis — they are written as concrete next actions.
- Apply the recommendations in order: iconography first, mediation second, narrative third.
- Use the resulting message architecture as the spine of your pitch and marketing materials.
What it adds to the report
- Translates the analytical scoring into commercial action
- Identifies which axis is blocking your current pitch from landing
- Provides the message architecture for sales materials, decks and rights fairs
- Aligns the creative, commercial and licensing teams around a single narrative
When to use it
- Before designing or refreshing the pitch deck
- Before approaching licensees or co-production partners
- When briefing a PR or marketing agency on the IP
- When the IP keeps generating warm interest that doesn't convert — the mitigation often lives here
Tool 08
30–60 Day GO/NO-GO Validation Plan
What it is
A structured validation plan with three to five concrete tests, each one fully specified with a metric, a success threshold, an indicative cost, a target audience and a decision rule. It is the actionable closing of the dossier — what to do next, not what to think next.
How you use it
- Read each test in full — metric, threshold, cost, audience, decision rule.
- Identify the tests that are feasible in your next 30–60 days with current resources.
- Assign each feasible test to an owner with a clear deadline.
- Run the tests. The decision rule of each test tells you whether to proceed, pivot or stop.
What it adds to the report
- Converts the dictamen into a runnable plan with explicit decision points
- Prevents the typical post-evaluation drift ("the report is great but now what?")
- Establishes a clear evidence trail for the next milestone decision
- Makes the IP visibly active in front of investors and partners
When to use it
- Immediately after receiving the dossier — it is the operational gateway
- Before reporting back to investors or board members
- When the team agrees the IP is promising but disagrees on what to do first
- As the basis of the next milestone review
The eight tools together
Used in isolation, each module is useful. Used together, they produce a complete decision-support system: Score Adjustment shows you where to improve, Investment Scenarios shows you what it would return, Territory Analysis shows you where to launch, Format Adaptation shows you which vertical to lead with, Risk Profile shows you what to fix, EdTech Fit arms your institutional pitch, Commercial Narrative arms your buyer pitch, and the Validation Plan gives you the next 60 days.
Decision-making 07 — IQVA is living material
Not a PDF.
An instrument.
Most IP evaluations end up as a slide deck that gets quoted out of context and then forgotten in a drawer. IQVA is built to be the opposite: a working instrument that stays useful for months, gets stress-tested in real conversations, and can be updated as the IP evolves. Four properties make this possible.
Traceable
Every conclusion in the dossier can be traced back to its source — either the material you provided (Evidence A) or our verified primary corpus (Evidence B). The Audit-Ready Evidence Matrix is built precisely for this: when a stakeholder challenges a finding, you can show the underlying support without leaving the document. This is what makes the dossier defensible in front of an investment committee.
Adjustable
The interactive modules let you simulate scenarios without commissioning a new evaluation. Want to know what would happen if your B4 score improved by 0.5? Adjust it. Want to model an aggressive entry into Asia instead of a balanced European launch? Run the scenario. The dossier responds to your questions in real time, not in the next quarter.
Updatable
As your IP progresses — a pilot is delivered, a licensee is signed, a registration is granted — you can request an updated evaluation that builds on the previous one. The system tracks the trajectory, so you don't start from scratch each time. You see the IP improving across versions, with documented evidence.
Defensible
Every number in the dossier has a rationale, every recommendation has its underlying logic visible. There is no black box, no "the algorithm decided". When you present the dossier to a buyer, a board or an investor, you can explain exactly why each conclusion was reached and on what evidence it rests. This is the difference between a report that helps and a report that wins.
A static evaluation tells you where you stand on the day it was written. A living evaluation tells you where you stand today, what would change if you moved, and what to do about it. IQVA is engineered for the second.
IP Frontier Studio · IQVA 2.0
Decision-making 08 — Three real use cases
How operators
actually use IQVA.
Three scenarios that recur across the operators who use IQVA professionally. Each one shows which sections of the dossier and which interactive modules are the natural starting point, and how the analysis translates into a concrete commercial move.
Case A
Pitching to a Publisher
You have a picture book IP and a meeting scheduled with an editorial group. You need to walk in with a defensible commercial argument, not just a creative pitch.
Start with the Block Scores in the Public Summary — your strongest dimensions are your opening line. Move to the Commercial Narrative module to lock the message architecture. Use Score Rationale & Adjustment to anticipate the publisher's pushback on weaker blocks and to show the credible path of improvement. Finish with the Validation Plan to demonstrate that you are running tests, not waiting for permission.
Start with the Block Scores in the Public Summary — your strongest dimensions are your opening line. Move to the Commercial Narrative module to lock the message architecture. Use Score Rationale & Adjustment to anticipate the publisher's pushback on weaker blocks and to show the credible path of improvement. Finish with the Validation Plan to demonstrate that you are running tests, not waiting for permission.
Relevant tools › Score Adjustment · Commercial Narrative · Validation Plan
Case B
Internal investment decision
Your board needs to decide whether to commit a development budget to expand the IP from editorial into audiovisual. The IQVA dossier is the third-party input that grounds the conversation in evidence rather than opinion.
Open with the Verdict and the IQVA Global as the executive headline. Move to the Vertical Breakdown to show that Audiovisual is rated Conditional rather than Ready, and what specifically blocks the Ready status. Use Investment & Return Scenarios to model the budget request against indicative break-even and ROI ranges. Close with the Risk Profile to demonstrate that the risks are identified, scored and being mitigated.
Open with the Verdict and the IQVA Global as the executive headline. Move to the Vertical Breakdown to show that Audiovisual is rated Conditional rather than Ready, and what specifically blocks the Ready status. Use Investment & Return Scenarios to model the budget request against indicative break-even and ROI ranges. Close with the Risk Profile to demonstrate that the risks are identified, scored and being mitigated.
Relevant tools › Vertical Breakdown · Investment Scenarios · Risk Profile
Case C
Territorial strategy review
You have international ambition for the IP and limited bandwidth to chase every territory. You need to sequence your geographical roll-out based on evidence rather than the partner who calls loudest.
Start in Block 5 — Territorial & Universal to read the structural travelability of the IP. Move to Territory Entry Analysis and run the four-variable adjustments for the markets you are considering. Cross-reference with the Format Adaptation Analysis to see which vertical leads in each territory (the same IP might lead with Editorial in Europe and Audiovisual in Asia). Use the Risk Profile for territory-specific risks that need pre-empting before a roll-out commitment.
Start in Block 5 — Territorial & Universal to read the structural travelability of the IP. Move to Territory Entry Analysis and run the four-variable adjustments for the markets you are considering. Cross-reference with the Format Adaptation Analysis to see which vertical leads in each territory (the same IP might lead with Editorial in Europe and Audiovisual in Asia). Use the Risk Profile for territory-specific risks that need pre-empting before a roll-out commitment.
Relevant tools › Territory Analysis · Format Adaptation · Risk Profile
A general principle
In every real use case, the pattern is the same: start with the relevant block in the dossier, open the interactive module that lets you stress-test it, and finish with the Risk Profile or the Validation Plan to convert the analysis into action. The dossier rewards active reading, not passive consumption.
Decision-making 09 — Requesting the Full Dossier
When you're ready
for the complete picture.
The Public Summary is shareable freely. The Full Dossier — with its complete methodology, traceability, comparables, extended evidence and the eight interactive modules — is delivered exclusively under a confidentiality agreement.
What you receive under NDA
Pages
25–30
Complete dossier in HTML format
Dimensions analyzed
6
With detailed rationale each
Verticals scored
4
Editorial · AV · Product · EdTech
Interactive modules
8
Live, adjustable, exportable
How to request
1
Write to us at contact@ipfrontierstudio.com with the subject "Full Dossier request — [IP Name]".
2
We send the NDA within one business day. Bilateral or unilateral, your choice.
3
Once signed, we deliver the Full Dossier within 24 hours by secure link.
4
Follow-up call available within the first week to walk through the dossier and the interactive modules together.
Already have a Full Dossier and want to update it?
If your IP has progressed since the original evaluation — new assets produced, new agreements signed, new registrations granted — you can request an updated dossier that builds on the previous one. Same email, same subject line with "[Update]" prefix.
Want a second opinion before requesting?
Send your Public Summary and a short context to contact@ipfrontierstudio.com with the subject "Pre-NDA conversation". We offer a 30-minute walkthrough at no cost to help you decide whether the Full Dossier is the right next step.
IP Frontier Studio
IQVA 2.0 — Reader's Guide
Document version · v1.0 · 2026 · Public distribution
ipfrontierstudio.com · contact@ipfrontierstudio.com
Registered in Safe Creative · Property of IP Frontier Studio